BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv7.23.0.1780803205//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://research.class.cityu.edu.hk/
X-WR-CALNAME:College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, CityUHK-Research
X-WR-CALDESC:In keeping with CityUHK’s mission, the College of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences (CLASS) builds and sustains a reputation as a leading center for the study of humanities and social sciences in Asia.
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
UID:MEC-95c9d994f8d75d4d60f8bb8f25902339@research.class.cityu.edu.hk
DTSTART:20210122T080000Z
DTEND:20210122T093000Z
DTSTAMP:20201201T031200Z
CREATED:20201201
LAST-MODIFIED:20240626
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:2
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:One Health Social and Public Policy Seminar
DESCRIPTION:Event Review\n\nFormat\nZoom\nSpeakers\nDr Nick OR\nA Tale of Two City-states: A Comparison of the State-led vs Civil Society-led Responses to COVID-19 in Singapore and Hong Kong\nThis paper compares the early pandemic response in Singapore and Hong Kong, two Asian city-states of similar sizes with a shared history of SARS, and advanced medical systems. Although both were able to contain the disease, they did so using two very dierent approaches. Using data from cross-national surveys, news, and mobility data, we demonstrate that, in protest-ridden Hong Kong, low governmental trust bolstered civil society, which focused on self-mobilization and community mutual-help. In Singapore, a state-led response model that marginalized civil society brought early success but failed to stem an outbreak among its egregated migrant population. The study sheds light on the roles of state and non-state actors in a crisis.\nProf Mark R THOMPSON\nPopularity without Performance: The Philippine Government Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic\nPhilippine President Rodrigo R. Duterte’s response to the COVID-19 virus has been in line with his ‘macho populism’ similar to Donald Trump’s in the US and Jair Bolsonaro’s in Brazil. Like these illiberal leaders, a lockdown of Metro Manila and most of the rest of the Philippines since mid-March was implemented only after Duterte’s initial denialism, in the face of the growing threat from the rapidly spreading virus. Once Duterte did nally act, it was in a haphazard (particularly in terms of the lack of adequate testing and contract tracing) and highly militarised fashion Yet recent opinion polls show Duterte’s popularity has actually increased despite the country’s poor performance during the pandemic (the highest caseload in Southeast Asia as of this writing). This paper analyzes Duterte’s political ‘success’ despite governance failures during the pandemic in ideational (populist appeals), institutional (the lack of accountability in the country’s ‘hyperpresidentialist’ system), and structural terms (the weakness of a socially oriented political alternative despite the country’s extreme levels of inequality).\nDr Nicholas THOMAS\nAnti-Microbial Resistance in China\nSince the turn of the century, China has been a major source of infectious disease outbreaks (SARS, H5N1, H7N9, COVID-19). It is also the source of the MCR-1 gene that confers resistance to colistin, a ‘last line’ antibiotic that can be deployed against multidrug resistant infections. With the largest population of any country combined with its status as a major supplier of produce, evaluating the emergence of AMR in China and Chinese responses to the threat is critical to understanding the global response. This paper starts by reviewing how Chinese authorities have framed the issue. The analysis focuses on antibiotic usage in both humans and the agricultural sector. Finally, the domestic and international implications of China’s responses are considered. Based on interviews with key Chinese and international ocials, scientists, and public health specialists as well as farmers and consumers, we present data that argues the securitization of AMR in China is currently more concerned with policy and resource competition than with addressing an existential threat.\nEvent details\nPlease refer to the event poster\nRegister\nClick here (after registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting)\nEnquiries\nOH.seminar@cityu.edu.hk ( mailto:OH.seminar@cityu.edu.hk )\n
URL:https://research.class.cityu.edu.hk/event-list/one-health-social-and-public-policy-seminar/
ORGANIZER;CN=One Health (CityU CLASS):MAILTO:
CATEGORIES:Seminar
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
